WELCOME TO MASONS AT WORK.
This site is under construction.
FREEMASONRY IS PROBABLY THE WORLDS LEADING SECRET SOCIETY. YOUR LOCAL MASONIC HALL IS THEIR MEETING PLACE.
Freemasonry is incompatible with Chistianity. Its origins stem from Judaism that denies the existence of Jesus Christ.
This is part of my story about what Freemasonry is proved time and time again to be all about. The lower ranks of Freemasonry appear to be unaware of what its upper ranks get up?
Queen Elisabeth II is Patron Head of UK Freemasonry. Her late father King George 6th was also a Freemason (mason) as is her husband the Duke of Edinburgh. Information is that the Prince of Wales has also become a Freemason athough Buckingham Palace deny this. However by becoming a Freemason it appears that Charles is following a Royal Family tradition. The Queen’s cousin, the Duke of Kent is Grand Master of all UK Freemasonry. Prince Michael of Kent is also a Freemason.
All magistrates and judges swear an oath of Fairness to all manner of men when they take up office. This oath is sworn to Queen Elisabeth II not to the people of the UK nation. It has been proved in my case and in many more such cases to be a fraud. That oath is shown generally speaking to have no meaning whatsoever. It is also worthy of note that all Members of Parliament also swear an oath of allegiance to Queen Elisabeth II. The time has come that these people must swear that oath to the people of the UK nation and not to the Patron Head of Freemasonry, a leading Secret Society. We no longer live in the middle ages but in the 21st century.
Murder attempts have been made on me by Northumbria Police Special Squad officers in February 2003 when my home at 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, came under their illegal siege when it along with most of my personal possessions were then stolen from me. Prime Minister Tony Blair and former Home Secretary David Blunkett have ignored these murder attempts detailed to them, along with the catalogue of serious establishment crime which led up to it. They are held in these circumstances to be unfit to hold any public office whatsoever. Reports say that Tony Blair is also a member of the Freemasons. The person who supplied that information was said to have gone missing around late July of 2004.
Click the link below to find out more about the leaders of the NEW WORLD ORDER now underway worldwide.
Here is your chance to see who the prominent Freemason's are in your area. For the first time it has become possible to obtain Masonic Year Handbooks online much to the distate of Freemason's who like to remain secret so that they can carry out their craft otherwise often known as their business of being crafty?
Click here for the 2004 Masonic Year Handbooks up until now hidden from public view.
H.R.H. Queen Elisabeth II
20th March 2005.
Your Royal Highness I wrote to you around four years ago on the matter of whether you bear any responsibility to act when judges and magistrates breach their Judicial Oath of Fairness which is sworn by all UK judges and magistrates to you. The reply that I received to my letter to you came from the Lord Chancellor’s Department. It was confirmation that you will not act when the judicial Oath is breached by judges and magistrates. It also served as confirmation that the UK does not have any truly independent or impartial tribunals or authorities established by law for the resolution of our citizens criminal or civil rights. These independent or impartial tribunals or bodies are required under Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. My own Durham and Newcastle County Court cases DH400950, DH400898 and NE01650 have shown and proved that the Judicial Oath is a fraud being carried on against the citizens of the UK nation. That Oath it is clear has no meaning to some or possibly even all UK judges. Mr Fraser Kemp MP was asked to raise this matter by me in the House of Commons. His written reply to my request for that was that he is not permitted to raise issues in the House.
In February of 2003 Northumbria Police Special Squad officers attempted to shoot me after my home then at 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, had come under what was an illegal Northumbria Police siege. My life was saved in that instance by a policewoman negotiator at the scene named to me as “Jo”. Three nights later two of their Special Squad officers attempted to impale me on an ornamental sword that had decorated a room of my home. This latter murder attempt made on me was witnessed by at least another five or six of their colleagues and it was one of them who then saved my life. I was not armed as a threat to anyone else but myself and was then prepared to die as a final protest at the catalogue of crime that had been used against me to bring about my situation. I had contributed to the House of Commons Home affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary and the price for doing that and my stand against Masonic crime of which I was subject has cost me my thirty year marriage, two homes, land, finances, the death of my father and most of my personal possessions. I was afterwards left without even my bed to lie on. Northumbria Police were heavily involved in these crimes used against me. I am aware that Mr C. Strachan, their present Chief Constable, a known member of Freemasonry, has been instrumental in allowing and assisting with these serious crimes. I give below a basic, but still quite lengthy summary of some of the crimes carried out against me by Northumbria Police and others.
I was a victim of another murder attempt in 1986 when I was battered and then struck by a car that was driven at me. I had unearthed land theft being carried on at the former British Coal Estates at Spennymoor, County Durham. It had a direct bearing to land that I had purchased from Durham County Council. There was a Masonic link with this land theft crime. The attempt on my life was then treated as being one of criminal assault. Two years ago a senior police officer told me that the matter should have been treated as one of the attempted murder of me. When the matter went to Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court, Tyne-Wear, a single magistrate dismissed the case without it having been heard. It was verified afterwards by a police officer that the magistrate concerned in that matter had no qualifications to allow him to act alone. The Houghton le Spring Magistrates Court Manager, Mr Bavidge, and the Lord Chancellor’s Department were involved in covering up that matter. Northumbria Police have continued throughout the years since then to try to deceive me and have failed in their public duty to act on this matter along with a catalogue of other crime used against me by them and others since then.
The Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court proceedings in that matter had been illegal. I had reported it to Northumbria Police. The Chief Constable of Northumbria Police was at that time Mr. John Stevens, now Lord Stevens, where no action whatsoever was taken on it by that force.
Myself, my wife and family later became subjects of a murder threat. The person who had made that threat repeated it to a Northumbria police officer. The officer agreed this fact. No action whatsoever was taken against the man who had made that threat.
In Durham County Court cases DH400950, DH400898, I was the plaintiff, and Newcastle County Court case NE401650 where I was the defendant. Material crime/misconduct was carried out against me by deputy District Judge Baird. He had previously heard and then refused my appeal against the judgement of District Judge Scott-Phillips in the matter of damage caused to our property following a vehicle collision with it. A Deputy District Judge is not allowed by law to hear any appeal let alone one from the higher court. The Durham County Court took no appropriate action on this matter. Instead they allowed Deputy District Judge Baird to cause me further damage by being the first judge to become involved in case NE401650 where he carried out further misconduct against me again causing me serious damage.
In 1996/7 I contributed to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary chaired by Lord Nolan. That contribution was to show me that being public spirited was probably the greatest mistake of my life. Facts have shown throughout that Freemasonry does indeed rule or at the very least influence the UK police and judiciary.
In the matter of the Durham and Newcastle County Court cases DH400950, DH400898 and NE401650, District Judge Scott-Phillips denied that he had made an Order that I be allowed to visit the offices of solicitor Nancy Bone then practicing from Durham to take copies from my files in the above referenced cases. She had withheld them by lien from me. District Judge Scott-Phillips had claimed that my visit to the office of solicitor Bone only been done with her agreement. That was instrumental in defeating a Contempt of Court charge against Solicitor Bone. Later, when solicitor Bone was struck from the Register of Solicitors and the final hearing of the above referenced cases had taken place, I received documentary evidence where solicitor Bone also agreed that my visit to her offices had in fact been “by Order of the Court” and had not been done with her permission. In the event I was never able to obtain any of the material documentation that I required in the above cases which was a further contribution to the perversion of the course of justice in those cases.
Solicitor Mr Paul Graney, then practicing from Houghton-le-Spring, Tyne-Wear, (also since struck from the Register of Solicitors) admitted in his affidavit that the contents of his Statutory Declaration sworn in the matter of case NE401650 was materially untrue. This matter was reported to Northumbria Police along with a copy of the affidavit sworn by solicitor Mr Paul Graney. Northumbria Police failed to take any appropriate action on that matter which again was a material contribution the perversion of the cause of justice in the above referenced cases.
In the matter of the above referenced cases, District Judge Cuthbertson sitting at the Durham and Sunderland County Courts heard my appeal against his own ruling. He had thus ruled illegally/improperly ruled in his own cause.
In the matter of the above referenced cases, solicitor Alison Stott then practicing from Durham had been attending the Durham Newcastle County Courts since June of 1994 with my civil opponent, Miss Shirley Carr. It was believed by me that she was acting as Miss Carr’s advocate. She was very instrumental in having me imprisoned at Durham under a Contempt of Court allegation in the matter of the above referenced cases. In January of 1996, solicitor Alison Stott declared to the Newcastle County Court, where recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding presided over it, that in fact she had not been acting for Miss Carr but had only been assisting her as she declared that she had a good grasp of the situation of the cases. The recorders reply to solicitor Stott was, “You are either acting for Miss Carr or you are not?” Solicitor Stott’s reply to the recorder was, “Well I am now sir.” During the material times, solicitor Stott had taken on the work herself, without the authority of the Durham County Court, of preparing the judges bundles ready for trial. She then secretly passed on that work for litigant Miss Shirley Carr to carry out. Miss Carr then omitted material documents from the judge's bundles which in the circumstances I did not know the full extent of. On June 1st 1994, District Judge Scott-Phillips had made an Order at the Durham County Court refusing Miss Shirley Carr’s application for consolidation of the three above referenced cases.
The bankruptcy claims made against me by Miss Shirley Carr following the perverse judgement of recorder John H Fryer-Spedding in the above referenced cases included the full costs of solicitor Alison Stott throughout the duration of the cases from June 1994. That despite her declaration to the Newcastle County Court In January 1996 that she had not up to that time been acting for Miss Shirley Carr but had only been assisting her. She therefore had no entitlement to any costs for the material times. Her claim for costs for the full duration of the cases amounted to theft under the Theft Act. Though I expressed my concern regarding this matter to District Judge Jones sitting at Durham County Court during the taxation of the cases, he failed to give that matter the importance which it warranted. Solicitor Stott had declared to the Newcastle County Court presided over by recorder H. Fryer-Spedding in January of 1996 that she had not up until that time been acting for Miss Carr in the above cases but had only been assisting her. Solicitor Stott’s declaration referred to here was subject to affidavits sworn following it. Witnesses to solicitor Stott’s declaration mentioned above, were Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding, my wife Joyce Kellett and solicitor Ms. Paula Tench. The material significance of solicitor Stott’s declaration to the Newcastle County Court in January 1996 was never given the importance that it had required by the courts.
The above mentioned Durham County Court Order of June 1st 1994 was amongst those documents which Miss Carr had omitted from the judges bundle. The Durham County Court Order of June 1st 1994 was never appealed by Miss Carr and stood at the time of the final hearing of the above referenced cases DH400950, DH400898 and NE401650. Recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding falsely alleged that the above cases had been consolidated and then unlawfully tried them as a consolidated action thus causing me very serious damage.
Miss Shirley Carr was represented in the final hearing of the above cases before recorder John H Fryer-Spedding at the Newcastle County Court in October 1996 by barrister Mr Richard Merritt. He had agreed that the above referenced cases had not in fact been subject of a consolidation Order under Miss Carr’s sole case against me being NE401650. Material documentary evidence is available to show this fact. He never raised any objection whatsoever when he was aware that the above cases were being unlawfully tried as a consolidated action under case number NE401650. As a barrister relative to that matter, he failed in his duty as an officer of the courts to make this fact known to the court.
Barrister Mr Richard Merritt also represented Miss Shirley Carr in my appeal against bankruptcy held at the London Appeal Court which followed and concerned the above referenced cases. He was well aware in the circumstances that the court presided over by recorder John H Fryer-Spedding had been illegal in the circumstances that I detail here. Again he never made any of the material facts known to that court showing that a solicitor or barristers obligations to our courts are also part of a fraud.
In the final hearing of the above referenced case before recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding, he went on with what amounted to a catalogue of serious crimes that he used against me to pervert the cause of justice. This is evidenced by what he claimed to have seen and what he claimed not to have seen in the video and other evidence which I provided to the court for use in the above cases. My allegations against the recorder are also borne out by the recorders own approved transcript of judgement. Included in that was his agreement that it had been his intention to deprive me of my rights. His reason for his doing that was never mentioned. However his agreement in this matter alone amounted to his gross breach of my rights under Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. Included in his actions to pervert the cause of justice, recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding warned me not to draw to his attention the fact that Miss Carr had commenced to swear material perjury while I cross examined her in the witness box. He said to me that it was pointless me doing that. In the circumstances, I now know why it had been so pointless.
In the circumstances above, recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding ruled that I pay most of the costs of the above cases. The recorder’s ruling at the Newcastle County Court in the above referenced cases and in the circumstances that I have written above, was the cause of my bankruptcy engineered from these crimes to defeat my prosecution and defence in the above cases.
My application for leave to appeal against the perverse ruling of recorder John H Fryer-Spedding was heard before Lord Justice’s Auld and Pill at the London Appeal Court. They refused my application. It was I think Lord Auld who argued at length that Freemasonry would not have been involved in my cases. Indeed most of the short time that I was allowed to use in that application involved my concerns at probable Masonic influence in them. In the circumstances I wrote to Lords Auld and Pill asking if they would declare any membership of Freemasonry. Their reply which I received on their behalf was that they did not enter into correspondence with litigants who had been before them.
I appealed against the possession of my home at Hetton-le-Hole at the Middlesborough County Court shortly before Christmas 2002 made under the bankruptcy ruling made against me in the circumstances which I detail here. My appeal was heard by District Judge Mainwaring. Durham County Court had transferred that matter to them after I made a damages claim against then for their part in the serious crimes which they had used against me. Durham County Court continues to fail to address my damages claim made against them. District Judge Mainwaring ruled in that appeal shortly before Christmas 2003 that my concerns at probable Masonic influence in my cases had no relevance. I had asked him to declare any membership of Freemasonry to me. He only claimed that he was not a Freemason when the proceedings had been concluded which in those circumstances had no relevance relative to my concerns about that matter.
On Thursday January 30th 2003 my appeal at the previous ruling of District Judge Mainwaring took place again at the Middlesborough County Court. I had supplied the judge in that matter, his name as yet unknown to me, with the case law ruling which was absolute proof that my concerns at Masonic involvement throughout my cases having been ignored by the courts throughout the duration of my above referenced cases, had in fact been gross violations of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. That judge expressed surprise to the court about it when he started to read it. I then felt ill and the Court Usher informed the judge of that. He immediately adjourned the case. My Appeal in that matter remains adjourned. The Middlesborough County Court still continues to ignore this material fact. I was taken to a hospital cardiac care ward when my Appeal against the possession of my home was adjourned.
On Monday 3rd February being around two working days later, a bailiff came to my home. He was accompanied by Northumbria police officers. Those police officers watched as the bailiff attempted to force an entry to my home. The law did not allow a bailiff to carry that out. A Bailiff was not allowed by law to force entry into any property in the course of his work. In protest at what was underway I doused myself in petrol and held an ornamental sword to my stomach that had decorated a room in my home. I threatened to light a match to my clothing and fall on the sword as what I had believed would have been my final protest at the mass of serious crime some of which I have mentioned above that had been used to bring about that situation.
Then the siege of my home at 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, by Northumbria Police Special Squad officers commenced. Water, electricity, gas and the telephone line to my house was cut off shortly afterwards. I required urgent medication for serious health problems, including insulin and was unable in the circumstances to take it. I had no water to drink. On the third night of the police siege, Northumbria Police Special officers battered down the door to my home. As far I could see there were around seven or eight of them. I stood at the top of the stairs of my home plucking up courage to fall on the sword again as my final protest to the crimes that had brought about my situation. Two of those police officers then rushed up the stairs and handcuffed me. They left the sword wedged between the handcuffs. Another police office followed up the stairs and stopped around two steps from the top of them. The other two police officers took one each of my shoulders and then made noises as they were forcing my shoulders down pushing my abdomen onto the sword. I cried out in pain as the sword started to pierce my abdomen. The other police officer who stood near to the top of the stairs then took hold of the centre of the handcuffs that bound my wrists. He dragged me headlong down the stairs away from the other two police officers who were clearly attempting to murder me thus saving my life. He must also have dragged the sword away that had been wedged between the handcuffs that bound me. The murder attempt that was made on me was witnessed by around other four or five others of that Special Police Squad. It is now clear that they too have remained silent on this matter.
I was then taken to Washington, Tyne-Wear, police station under arrest. I reported the murder attempts made on me to the custody sergeant on duty there. He reluctantly said that he would include that matter in his report. It is now clear that Northumbria Police have totally ignored that very serious matter if indeed that Duty Sergeant had reported it to his senior authority.
Then I was taken to Sunderland Royal Hospital. I was at first refused any visitors until Northumbria Police were informed by my legal representative that what they were doing was illegal. The Hospital I understand was also made aware of the fact that they were implicated in that matter. Then I was allowed visitors but only with a police officer in attendance. One such police officer informed me that his instructions were to note down anything that he heard which might have been of interest to Northumbria Police. On arrival at Washington Police Station following my arrest a police doctor had especially ordered essential medication that I had required. That medication remained at Washington police station and never went with me to hospital. Afterward there was confusion at the Sunderland Royal Hospital at what medication I had required and some of the medication that I received there was not appropriate for my medical conditions.
In the matter of my concern of probable Masonic influence I requested the Durham County Court judges to declare any membership of Freemasonry especially given the fact that I had contributed to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary and was still then in correspondence with Lord Nolan. The judges ignored that request. I prepared a form on which these judges could declare any such membership of Freemasonry. The Court manager would not allow them to make such declaration. His decision in this matter was backed up by the Court Service. When I approached Lord’s Woolf and Bingham on my concern regarding Masonic influence in my cases, they said that my concern about that had no relevance to my cases. In fact, where any litigant expresses any concerns about the independence or impartiality of any UK court, and such court fails to address that matter in the first instance, that becomes an automatic violation of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention.
I appealed against the possession of my home at Hetton-le-Hole to the Middlesborough County Court. Its possession had been fabricated under the bankruptcy ruling made against me in the circumstances of which I detail. Durham County Court had transferred that matter to Middlesborough after I had made a damages claim against the Durham County Court for their part in the serious crimes which they had used against me. District Judge Mainwaring ruled that my concerns at probable Masonic influence in my cases had no relevance to them. I had asked him to declare any membership of Freemasonry to me. He only claimed that he was not a Freemason when the proceedings had been concluded which in fact had no relevance relative to my concerns about that matter.
In late 2002 a further hearing was arranged at the Middlesborough County Court to hear my appeal at the ruling made by District Judge Mainwaring just prior to Christmas 2002. I had supplied the judge in that matter, his name as yet unknown to me, with the case law ruling as proof that my concerns at Masonic involvement in my cases having been ignored throughout the duration of my above referenced cases had in fact been a violation of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention.
In my appeal against bankruptcy before Mr Peter Leaver Q.C. sitting at the London Appeal Court, he told me that he was not concerned about the evidence that I had provided for his use showing that serious fraud had been used throughout to bring my arrival to that bankruptcy situation. He Ordered further costs against me in my appeal against my alleged bankruptcy.
In late May of 1998 I obtained confirmation that my wife, Joyce Kellett, had used forgery to register our property 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, into her sole name. It had previously been registered at the HM Durham District Land Registry in our joint names. She had also used forgery to register land that had been previously in my name into her sole name. My wife had concealed from me the true amount of our savings and which were verified to be substantially well above the amount claimed from me in bankruptcy. I reported this matter to Northumbria Police who again failed to take appropriate action on it.
I informed Mr B.J. Inglis, the Official Receiver, then situated at Stockton-on-Tees, the fact that I was not and could not in the above circumstances be a declared bankrupt. He failed to reply to my letter regarding this matter and was in these circumstances party to allowing that illegal bankruptcy made against me in the circumstances that I have mentioned above.
My wife, Joyce Kellett, had commenced living at our additional property situated at Dacre Banks, North Yorkshire, in June of 1998. I am presently deprived of the use of that property. I reported the use of my wife’s forgeries in the matter of our marital home and land that had been previously registered at HM Land Registry in my sole name, situated at Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, to the Chief Constable of North Yorkshire, Mr Kenworthy. He refused to take any appropriate action on that matter. I informed him that in these circumstances he was liable to a lawful citizen’s arrest for failing to carry out his public duty which amounted to the crime of his misconduct in public office. Following this he sent two of his detectives from North Yorkshire to my home at Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear to interview me. They saw and took with them copies of material evidence of my allegations of my wife’s use of forgery mentioned above. Though there was more such similar evidence available to them, they told me that they had enough for them to work on. Afterwards I received a letter from North Yorkshire Police which said that they had insufficient evidence to act on and would not be taking any action on this matter. Their approach to the Land Registry concerned with the property at Dacre Banks was all that would have been required by them as part of the substantial evidence if my allegations.
In 1999 I was subject of arrest by Northumbria Police. It was alleged by them that I had breached an injunction obtained against me by Miss Shirley Carr. At Washington police station I was denied access to a solicitor or doctor. Later when I had trouble breathing I was dumped by Northumbria police officers outside of the Casualty Wing of Sunderland Royal Hospital. There I suffered further injury when a tube folded in a vein or artery which had been inserted into my arm. No such alleged injunction under which I had been arrested had existed. The Police Complaints Commission agreed by letter that in this matter the arrest of me by Northumbria Police had been unlawful and that my continued detainment by that police force had also been unlawful. The letter received from the Police Complaints authority regarding this was amongst the many such similar documents stolen from me when my home at 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, was itself stolen from me in February 2003. That was with the full assistance and involvement of Northumbria Police. The theft of this letter is defeating a damages claim in this matter which I wish to make against Northumbria police.
Northumbria Police appointed acting Inspector Steve Coxon to look into some of my allegations made against them and others concerning such matters of the use of perjury carried out by Miss Shirley Carr the person mentioned above. They also agreed to investigate the matter of recorder John Fryer-Spedding’s catalogue of acts which he carried out against me to pervert the course of justice. That is also shown to have been another fraud carried out against me by Northumbria Police. It was clear that acting Inspector Mr S. Coxon never carried out any of the alleged investigation it was claimed that he had been appointed to do.
In 1997 I had been party to a regional radio broadcast where the matter of Freemasonry had been part of the discussion. The morning after that a man called at our home. He told my wife and I that unless I gave up on the matter of my concerns about Freemasonry our home could be burnt down. He cited as an example a man with the name of a Mr John Coates who he said had similar views on Freemasonry to myself. He said that man’s Deep Freezer Centre had been burnt down as a result of his refusal to let his Masonic matters drop. In January of 1998 my wife and I heard evidence which suggested that in fact this mans Deep Freezer Centre, said to be situated at South Shields, Tyne-Wear, may well have been burned down. Shortly after that incident my wife left our marital home. In June of 1998 she commenced divorce proceedings against me. That matter too was reported to Northumbria Police who also ignored it as well.
Another false allegation was made against me by Miss Shirley Carr who is mentioned above. She claimed that I had approached and threatened harassment of her at the Sunderland County Court in matters concerning the above referenced cases. Northumbria Police prosecuted me under that allegation and I was convicted of that at the Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court. I then obtained a copy of a letter which had been written by Mr Head, then Chief Crown Prosecutor situated at Washington, Tyne-Wear, to solicitor, Mr Jackson of Hartlepool who had acted for me in that matter. Mr Head’s letter wrote that Northumbria Police had interviewed a security officer of the Sunderland County Court who was on duty there at the time of Miss Carr’s allegation that I had approached and threatened harassment of her. Mr Heads letter went on to say that the Security officer had told Northumbria police that he could recall the day in question and that nothing of note had occurred at the Sunderland County Court at the material time. That letter was withheld from the courts which had also included the London Appeal Court. Northumbria Police agreed that withholding such material evidence from the courts had amounted to a criminal act. They agreed to investigate that matter. Like the rest of such similar matters of crime carried out against me, Northumbria police never carried out an investigation into that either. However, Mr Head’s letter to Mr Jackson was proof that they had been aware of these facts at the time they too were parties to my prosecution and conviction under the 1997 Harassment Act at Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court.
Prior to my bankruptcy mentioned above, I was a Hetton-le-Hole Town Councillor. I was barred from remaining in that position by virtue of the Bankruptcy Order made against me. While I had been a Hetton-le-Hole Town Councillor, I raised an objection before the Council that three members of the Blackburn family of Councillors and their Son in Law, Mr C. Simpson, had failed to declare an interest in the matter of land subject of housing proposals part of which was owned by one of them. Two of those Councillors were also member of the Freemasons. At a later meeting of the Council these same Councillors failed to stand down on the housing proposals matter. They spoke to the Council in favour of those housing proposals. They were in full awareness that Councillor Mr J. Blackburn would become, as his Councillor father had agreed in the circumstances, that were the housing proposals relative to his land approved, a very rich man. I had again raised my concerns to the Council regarding this matter. I was then prevented from leaving the Hetton Council Chambers until an assault had been carried out against me by three members of the Blackburn family. I reported that matter to Northumbria Police. They appointed an Inspector Williams or Williamson to investigate that matter. A few days later he telephoned me to say that as he did not think that the rest of the Hetton Town Councillors who witnessed that assault on me and my having been prevented from leaving the Council Chambers, would say what they had witnessed of the incident, he had therefore decided to take no action on that matter. Later when this Inspector retired I was given information that he too was a member of the Freemasons.
I was assaulted at my home by a Mr Wilf Husband a local quarry owner. He claimed that while I was a Councillor I had raised my objections to some matters dealing with his use of his quarry to Sunderland Town Council. In fact I had not done that but had raised my concern about that to the Hetton-le-Hole Town Council as had another member of the Council. Mr Husband called at my home and then assaulted me. I reported that matter to Northumbria Police as well but they never acted on that matter either which has been true to the many such instances of crime which has been used against me. .
In the year 2000 I was arrested by Durham Constabulary under what was later shown to have been a false allegations made against me by a doctor since also known to be a member of the Freemasons as many doctors are. It was then necessary for me to be taken to the Dryburn Hospital Cardiac Care ward. I overheard a telephone conversation where the Ward Sister there was making arrangements for me to be transferred to the Cherry Knowle Psychiatric Hospital near Sunderland. I had not been subject of Sectioning under the Mental Health Act so to have taken me to the Cherry Knowle Hospital would have been a criminal act in those circumstances. There have been over five such similar acts to try to have me Sectioned under the Mental Health Act within the past two years which of course have all failed. I and others are aware now that this criminal ploy is extensively being used to help silence the victims of police and judicial crime. Mr Andy McCardle was subject of such similar injustice and then unlawfully imprisoned at Carstairs State Hospital, Scotland. He was found dead there on Boxing Day last. I and a colleague examined his body just prior his burial. Attempts appeared to have been made to conceal the fact that his lips had been glued together and that it was probable that his jaw had also been broken which may have been the cause of his death. It is my understanding that the police are now investigating this matter
Mr Patrick Timothy the Chief Registrar of the Durham District Land Registry was made aware of the facts of my wife’s use of forgery to convert our marital home and land that has been registered to me there into her sole name by means of her forgeries. He refused to take any action on those matters. Mr Patrick Timothy also refused to take any appropriate action on the matter of solicitor Mr Paul Graney having sworn material perjury in his Statutory Declaration that had been used to make a false entry on the Durham District Land Register that related to case NE401650. Durham Constabulary also refused to take any appropriate action on that water as well. Mr Timothy told me that he had the power of discretion. His alleged power of discretion had amounted to him being a party to what amounted to serious crime.
From my tape recorded interview with Mr P. Timothy, I am reasonably sure that he is also a member of the Freemasons though he denies this.
Inspector Gibson of Durham Constabulary told me that when judges lie, as they did in my above referenced cases, they had to regard such judicial lies as a judicial decision and therefore to protect them. He said that he spoke on behalf of the Chief Constable of the Durham Constabulary. In the circumstances the crime carried out against me at Durham County Court was never acted on by Durham Constabulary or indeed Northumbria Police. This I think helps show just how serious such matters have become when a police force admits that it must protect judicial lies.
Northumbria police refused to accept from me a bundle of documents that served as evidence of my allegations of some the crime that had been used against me in the above referenced cases.
I represented my father, William Kellett, since deceased, then of 103 Elemore Lane, Easington Lane, Tyne-Wear, at the Sunderland County Court in his case also very material to the above case No. NE401650. Despite recorder John. H Fryer-Spedding’s many lies and very apparent misunderstanding of material law which are evidenced in cases DH400950 DH400898 and NE401650, he had still ruled that my father was the most likely person to have attained title to the land subject of case NE401650 where I was alleged by Miss Shirley Carr to have been a trespasser on it. District Judge Cuthbertson, sitting at the Durham County Court ruled that my father’s action to go back into possession of his land was an abuse of court time and then dismissed it.
I represented my father William Kellett at his Appeal against the above ruling of District Judge Cuthbertson sitting at the Sunderland County Court. My father’s Appeal was held at the Sunderland County Court. Circuit Judge Helen Paling was the presiding judge. When she came into the courtroom she warned me not to speak. I was warned by the court usher on duty there that if I continued to try to speak I could be held in Contempt of Court and be imprisoned. Circuit Judge Helen Paling then dismissed my fathers Appeal. I reported that matter to the Lord Chancellor’s Department. Circuit Judge Helen Paling then claimed that what had taken place at the Sunderland County Court had been in error. There had not been any error. However such alleged error was never corrected and my father remained without the land that had been subject of case NE401650. I think it was then there was the full realisation that there had been a conspiracy to defeat the above cases and my father was also subjected to that. Miss Shirley Carr never had any title to the land subject of case NE401560 and this is fact. In the circumstances I could not and was not a trespasser on that land. It is clear that had my father’s case to go back into possession of the land subject of case NE401650, had it been allowed to continue, would have defeated the above case NE401650 had it been lawfully tried before recorder John H, Fryer-Spedding. In the circumstances the final hearing of the above referenced cases was unlawful. The above cases were never subject of a consolidation Order into Miss Shirley Carr’s case NE401650 as had been falsely alleged by the recorder. The opposite situation had been true.
I also remain deprived of that land subject of case NE401650 though the substantial evidence is that I remain the lawful owner of it. The Durham District Land Registry later made a retrospective registration to Miss Shirley Carr of the land subject of case NE401650. This despite Miss Shirley Carr not having any title or grounds whatsoever to lawfully allow that. Mr Peed, employed at the Durham District Land Registry, agreed in his letter written on my behalf that it was probable that Miss Carr’s registration of the land was in error. A false entry was made on the Durham District Land Register following solicitor Mr Paul Graney’s admission in his affidavit that his Statutory Declaration sworn relative to the land in the above referenced case was materially untrue. This was part of the conspiracy used to defaud me of the land subject of case NE401650.
Solicitor Alison Stott was party to that conspiracy when she withheld material information from the Durham District Land Registry in the matter of case NE401650.
The matters concerning the murder attempts made on me detailed above and some of the material crime used against me leading up to that were reported to Prime Minister Mr Tony Blair and former Home Secretary Mr D. Blunkett. Both of these people have ignored those matters. I had required of Prime Minister Mr Blair a Public Inquiry into my cases. My request for that again did not receive a reply from No.10 Downing Street, London. I do realise that such Inquiry would likely show the proof of my statements made above.
The indications are that Northumbria Police are again setting me up as their victim. Corrupt authority surely should never be regarded as any authority at all. More especially such as the situation which I have reported to you above regarding Northumbria Police, I have not included the full extent of their crime/misconduct which they have used against me over several years. Time does not allow me to do this at present.
It is of even greater concern to me when I was given information that Prime Minister Mr Tony Blair is also a Freemason. The person who supplied that information I understand was often close to Mr Blair in the course of his work. That informant has since disappeared and it was said that he had left his residence without even paying his bills or leaving a forward address.
I also received a threat that I would disappear or suffer a fatal accident unless I backed away from Masonic matters. This threat was reported to both Northumbria and Cumbria police who took no interest in that.
In concluding this letter to you I refer again to the Judicial Oath of Fairness sworn by all UK magistrates and judges to you. Had that Judicial Oath of fairness meant what it is supposed to mean, it is certain I would not have been placed in the serious situation in which I am now in. It is because of the huge number of breaches of the Judicial Oath carried out by the various judges that I name here, that I firmly believe that your Royal Highness has an obligation to take steps to set in motion an appropriate action for a just and final outcome to the above matters,
I suffered a heart attack shortly after Northumbria Police Special Squad officers attempted to murder me at my home at Hetton-le-Hole in February of 2002. I have remained in poor health since that time. I wish to die at my home at 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear. How this might happen is immaterial to me now that my health continues to fail. I am aware of course that to take action to repossess my home without due consent or authority is likely, given the circumstances described above, to mean my death. It is in these same circumstances I request that you involve yourself in taking any appropriate action to allow my return to my home as a matter of urgency.
The final hearing of cases DH400950, DH400898 and NE401650 was and remains unlawful in the circumstances described and evidenced above. All that has stemmed from that also remains unlawful.
My Appeal against the possession of my home at 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, adjourned at the Middlesborough County Court on 30th January 2003 remains adjourned despite that court failing in its duty to take appropriate action to right this situation. The evidence that I produced in that Appeal against the possession of my home of the 30th January 2003 upholds it and I remain deprived of it in that matter alone. The catalogue of other facts and evidence detailed above are also all very material to these matters and require an independent examination.
I declare that the statements which I Maurice Kellett, ( address withheld for the purposes of this publication only) have made above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.